Outline of Rules
1. Team Eligibility
All law schools are eligible to participate in the competition. Students must be enrolled full-time or part-time in a program of study leading to the equivalent of a State exam or a LLB.
2. Eligibility of Master and Ph.D. (D.Phil.) students and students who are registered in a bar association
Students who are enrolled in a program of a study leading to a Master of Law degree are eligible to compete in the Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot Court only with the prior written permission of the organisers.
Students enrolled in a Ph.D. program are not eligible.
Students who are or were ever registered in a bar association are not eligible.
3. Number of team members
Each team must complete a registration form and submit the form by the deadline determined below. In addition, each Team must designate a Team Coach.
Each University may register only one team.
The overall number of participating teams/universities is limited to 45 teams. The first 45 teams, which send us the completed registration form, will be accepted.
Due to an adequate geographical representation, the number of participating teams from each country is limited to 6 teams.
In countries with more than six registered national teams, participation in the Pre-Moot Court is mandatory. Only the best six teams from the Pre-Moot Courts will be eligible to participate in Frankfurt.
Please send the scanned registration forms as attachment via email to MootCourt@jura.uni-frankfurt.de.
Team registrations must be submitted to the organisers from 1st September 2013 until December 15th 2013. No changes may be made to team members after this date.
The skeleton arguments must be submitted to the Wilhelm Merton Centre until February 15th 2014 via email.
No fees are charged for participation as team in the competition.
II. Skeleton Arguments and Rules for the Hearings
1. Skeleton Arguments
1. 1. Submission of Skeleton Arguments
Each team participating in the competition must prepare two Skeleton Arguments (claimant and respondent). Each team must submit via email one copy of its Skeleton Arguments to the Administrator on the date specified on the official homepage of the competition.
1. 2. Format of Memorials
The font and size of the text of the Skeleton Arguments must be in Times New Roman 12-points and 1,5 space.
1. 3. Length
The Skeleton Arguments may not be longer than 2.500 words.Both skeleton arguments together (claimant + respondent) should not have more than 2.500 words, but smaller exceeding will be tolerated.
The word count shall be conducted using the standard „Word Count“ feature in Microsoft Word.
1. 4. Information Contained on the Skeleton Arguments Cover
Each Skeleton Argument is to have two cover sheets.
The first page should indicate the name of the university or the team if more than one team participates from the same university, as well as the names of the team members.
The second cover page should contain the following information (a) the text "Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot" with an indication of the year of the competition; (b) the title of the documents stating whether it is submitted on behalf of Claimant(s) or Respondent(s).
2. Rules for the Hearing
2. 1 . General Procedures
In principle each group will consist of four teams, which means that each team will plead three times in the General Rounds. If the number of participating teams is not divisible by four, some teams will have to plead four times, instead of three times, but only the best three results of their four pleadings will count. Generally the choice of being a team which has to plead four times is voluntary. This choice will be made on the day before the General Rounds (registration day). If there will be more teams wanting to plead four times than possible, the teams which will plead four times will be drawn by lot. The same procedure will take place if there are not enough teams wanting to plead four times. If unexpectedly a team, which appeared on the registration day, does not appear on the first day of the General Rounds the schedule of pleadings will not be changed, which means that some teams will have to plead one time alone.
Each hearing will have a duration of about sixty (60) minutes. Each party will have thirty (30) minutes for its presentation. Prior to the beginning of each hearing each party must determine how it wishes to allocate the thirty minutes among its advocates and how many of these thirty minutes it wishes to set aside for rebuttal.
At least two members from each team shall make oral presentations during each oral hearing. The arbitrators may, at their discretion, extend the time allocated to each party beyond the thirty (30) minute allocation. In doing so, they must have regard to the equality of the parties.
2. 2. Quarter-Finals, Semi-Finals and Finals
Each Hearing of Quarter-Finals will have a duration of about sixty (60) minutes. Each party will have thirty (30) minutes for its presentation. Each Hearing of Semi-Finals and Finals will have a duration of about ninety (90) minutes. Each party will have forty-five (45) minutes for its presentation.
2. 3. Scope of Pleadings
The arbitrators will identify up to three core issues for the parties to address in their oral pleadings sixty minutes before the commencement of the hearing. This does not in any way restrict the arbitrators' powers to ask questions concerning other aspects of the case.
2. 4. Order of Pleadings
The Tribunal will determine which side will plead first at the commencement of the hearing depending on the subject matter in dispute.
3. Competition Scoring
3. 1. Scoring
In each pleading each team can receive up to 300 points.
The teams to proceed into the Round of Sixteen are the best 16 teams according to their points received in the pleadings in the General Rounds.
Scoring is on the basis of the oral hearings. The arbitrators will grade the teams on the basis of the advocates' knowledge of law, their command of the facts as well as their advocacy skills.
In the Round of Sixteen, Quarter-Finals, Semi-Finals and in the Final, the decision which team has won shall be made by a majority of the arbitrators.
3.2. Winning Team
The Winning Team is the team that wins in the Final.
3.3. Best Team from a Non-OECD-Member Country
The Best Team from a Non-OECD-Member Country is selected on the basis of points accumulated during the competition. 300 points for each victory in a Semi-Final or Final are added to the accumulated scoring.
3.4. Best Advocate
The Best Advocate will be selected by the person designated by the organisers. The selection of the Best Advocate will be made on the basis of the advocate's knowledge of law, command of the facts and advocacy skills.
geändert am 05. September 2013 E-Mail: Webmasterrudak@uni-frankfurt.de| | Zur Navigationshilfe
Druckversion: 05. September 2013, 13:20